About Me

Name:Gayle Plato-Besley, M. Ed.
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

One Third of all Black Americans Terminated

 FACT of US CENSUS- 38.3 million:

The estimated number of U.S. residents who were black or black in combination with one or more other races as of

July 1, 2002. This race group then made up 13.3 percent of the total population.
 

This post will be concise as facts say it all; US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Barack Obama's words stand alone.  The quotes should lead me to believe Mr. Obama wants to see all black and multi-racial children have a chance to succeed.  If so, there is no way he would support abortion.  The fact is no conspiracy theory-filled Reverend Jeremiah Wright talking of HIV being forced upon blacks, nor reverberated memories of civil unrest, slavery, nor vile Tuskegee Experiments of the 1930s can even remotely touch the racial genocide of the last 35 years. 


Young women are being racially profiled in the most evil of ethnic cleansing.  This is all a product of  liberal propaganda.  It must stop and only the African-American role models can truly change the horror.  Where are the Black preachers when it comes to the rights of the unborn?  Are black children less valuable than all others? Barack Obama is a false prophet at best when he ignores the
 needs of child bearing women of color.  Help these women find a value to life.
 
Abortion has changed the face of America, irrevocably extracting African-Americans by the

millions.  In any other definition, this would be considered a genocidal event.

The CDC publishes undeniable facts.  A recent article from The National Black Catholic Congress website  states the following from their research:
 
"According to the CDC, since 1973, the year of the Supreme Court Decision Roe vs. Wade, 13 million (13,000,000) African American lives have been lost to abortion. The CDC reports that of the approximately 4000 abortions that are performed daily in the United States, 1452 of them are performed on African American women and their pre-born children. This means that although African Americans represent only 12% of the population of the United States, they account for 35% of the abortions performed in this country." http://www.nbccongress.org/features/abortion_silent_no_more_01.asp
 
 I will not vote for Barack Obama for many issue-related reasons.  But I am DEEPLY TROUBLED that African-American leaders do not face this reality immediately.  As I had stated in another article, the "choice" of abortion is propaganda forced on young women.  Minority women are especially indoctrinated ( as evidenced in the satistics) to believe that children are a burden.  We are changing the face of our nation and underscoring a terrible message that children of color are not valued. 
 
No credible politician can stand up and discuss discrimination nor We the People without tackling the horrendous loss of life.  How do we know where the next Mya Angelou, Colin Powell, Frederick Douglass,  Condelezza Rice, Thurgood Marshall, Denzel Washington, or Duke Ellington will arise?  How many greats of this generation suffer as unborn souls looking down from heaven, heavy in the light of shame- a Paradise Lost?

-Gayle Plato-Besley
 
 
NOTES OF INTEREST-
Senator Barack Obama said this:
"Thirty-five years after the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, it's never been more important to protect a woman's right to choose... Throughout my career, I've been a consistent and strong supporter of reproductive justice, and have consistently had a 100% pro-choice rating with Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America... I believe in and have supported common-sense solutions like increasing access to affordable birth control to help prevent unintended pregnancies... As President, I will improve access to affordable health care and work to ensure that our teens are getting the information and services they need to stay safe and healthy."
[From a statement by Sen. Obama on the 35th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, January 22, 2008. Full statement is available here:
http://www.barackobama.com/2008/01/22/obama_statement_on_35th_annive.php]
 
He also said this:
 
"If we aren't willing to pay a price for our values, if we aren't willing to make some sacrifices in order to realize them, then we should ask ourselves whether we truly believe in them at all."
A Barack Obama quote from his book, "Audacity of Hope" (Chapter 2)
 
And this:

"We should never forget that God granted us the power to reason so that we would do His work here on Earth - so that we would use science to cure disease, and heal the sick, and save lives."

BARACK OBAMA, speech, Dec. 1, 2006
 
 
Finally, this is a quote from Obama's
"A More Perfect Union"speech:
 
"In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be addressed.   Not just with words, but with deeds – by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations.  It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper." http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/samgrahamfelsen/gGBbKG
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

US/Mexico Borderland- Gaza Strip Bound?

by Gayle Plato-Besley, M. Ed.

Sitting in Phoenix, the Arab-Israeli conflict along the Gaza Strip seems constant and doesn't even blip on the radar of the average American.  Why should it?  Because we've a chance to see the parallels of our borderland conflicts. We must stop the exponential growth of warring organized crime now becoming a political stronghold at our doorstep. 
 
Whether Phoenix, El Paso, Tucson, or Tijuana, all borderland states' populated cities are part of the drug cartel super highway bleeding out over the Mexican border. Crystal Meth is liquid gold for Mexico.  In fact, there is a growing middle class, community infrastructure, and a war-lord feudal state reaching a political tipping point. We may jabber on about the cheap labor taking over our cities or the funds we spend on social programs for illegal aliens, but we are missing the real issue.  Look to Gaza- Hamas, the former PLO, Israeli and American push-me/pull-me politics with the Gaza Strip, and see how a borderland goes ballistic. 
 
One of the most accurate and insightful experts about Gaza and the crisis upon the region is Benjamin Netanyahu, former Israeli Prime Minister and current Likud Party Leader.  He often explains the dire consequences of the 2005 Israeli pull-out of Gaza.  He said then that the region  will become a puppet entity of Iran, and he was right.  Hamas is backed by Iranian extremism, private Saudi funds, and international Jihadist Evil ( thats with a capital E). 
 
Hamas started in February, 1988, in the Gaza strip as a counter movement to Yasser Arafat and the PLO. Their charter states that their focus is to keep Palestine in Muslim hands and to wipe out Israel.  They profess daily  to keep up the Muslim Jihad . But the layers of Hamas are ignored often by the Western media.  They are not a one-dimensional entity.  Hamas has a branch that funnels money into the community too, grooming loyalty of the locals.  Gaza has been a crowded world of Muslim, Jewish, and Christians.  They were cheap labor, and worked fertile soils of organic foods for instance.  Gaza went back to Palestinian control and all Hell broke loose.  While Hamas promised a peace with Israel, it didn't happen.  See Mr Netanyahu speak on Hannity and Colmes here:

 

While we are not a small nation like Israel, carved out of a political region just 60 years ago.  We can't deny what our borderland might become.  Drugs are a growing business and the beginning of political process:
 

"Cartels can challenge — and supplant — governments. Between huge amounts of money available to bribe officials, and covert armies better equipped, trained and motivated than national police and military forces, the cartels can become the government — if in fact they didn’t originate in the government. Getting the government to deploy armed forces against the cartel can become a contradiction in terms. In their most extreme form, cartels are the government."  (http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/geopolitics_dope)
 
 
Startfor.com defines the future dilemma I see as a critical facet of out REAL border battle.  The local politicians and criminal justice operatives of all U.S. Border states need to come together, and push to problem-solve. A prophetic take by political analyst and writer, George Friedman  is detailed here:
 
"The likely course is a multigenerational pattern of instability along the border. More important, there will be a substantial transfer of wealth from the United States to Mexico in return for an intrinsically low-cost consumable product — drugs. This will be one of the sources of capital that will build the Mexican economy, which today is 14th largest in the world. The accumulation of drug money is and will continue finding its way into the Mexican economy, creating a pool of investment capital. The children and grandchildren of the Zetas will be running banks, running for president, building art museums and telling amusing anecdotes about how grandpa made his money running blow into Nuevo Laredo.
It will also destabilize the U.S. Southwest while grandpa makes his pile. As is frequently the case, it is a problem for which there are no good solutions, or for which the solution is one without real support."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Disenfrancised Voters and Le Morte d'Arthur

by Gayle Plato-Besley, M. Ed.
 
What if a political advisory panel feels their candidate might be in for a close race in the upcoming election?  Crystal balls are notoriously cloudy and tea leaves tend to stain. So to secure  the future with the 'inevitable' party nominee, make sure your advising voodoo spin doctors brew the alchemy Merlin would envy when they start to "Rock the Vote".
 
I can feel Terry McAullife's far reaching boney Wraith-like hand resting on the shoulder of the popular voters; he created this disenfranchised voter debacle well before Hillary offered up her  Blue State Kool-Aid. Jonesing for a sip, the liberal media took the bait.  It's all about naughty state party members trying to get their way, they broke the rules, and now they pay.    Poor voters.  Poor Democracy. I smell a rat, and a touch of poison too. 
 
Was it not Terry McAuliffe, former Democratic National Committee Chair, who said prior to the 2004 election:
 
"Move your primary too early, Terry McAuliffe warned, and Michigan will lose half its delegates to the 2004 Democratic convention...The closest they'll get to Boston will be watching it on television...I will not let you break this entire nominating process for one state. The rules are the rules."(http://blogs.tampabay.com/buzz/2007/10/plenty-of-blame.html)
 
Clinton's team saw an out:  Create a delegate disenfranchisement exit plan to help gobble up valuable delegates if Hillary starts to get heat from competition.  Make sure all of the votes are invalid, get the candidates to agree to not run or campaign in these huge states with mondo delegate counts, and if lucky, make sure only your candidate is on the ballot.  If all goes south, one can either claim the rules are the rules, or let the vote count, or just shout- "Do Over!"  This whole mess began the day the democrats nashed teeth about Al Gore not getting his win in 2000.  The democrats vowed retribution then.  But none really suspected the crazy fervor of lovestruck idolatry for Mr. Barack Obama. The Clinton Alchemists forgot about how important faith, worship, and a need for a hero really play with voters.  
 
So now, with at least three mastermindful exit strategies, what to do?  Lawyers never ask a question nor make an exit without a planned move.  Really, the voter disenfrancised makes perfect sense on paper.  But as I suspected months ago, the DNC and the Clinton machine cannot see beyond the strategy and science of brewing up witchy woman win.  They missed the boy-king scenario, Obama freeing  the sword from the stone.  Ah, the makings of a new Camelot.  
 
Yet while Hillary cannot win, she can still destroy.  Do any of these political hacks remember Le Morte d'Arthur?  Sir Thomas Malory did not pull punches.  Arthur's reign goes down in defeat, death--to Avalon, legend taking back the boy-king to live another day. Everyone betrays Arthur.  I wince when I see the John F. Kennedy comparisons for Barack Obama.  Running for President can be inherently dangerous; just ask Bobby Kennedy's kids.  Pile on a political adversary with virtual sociopathic-like advisors and I am truly afraid what the Clintonian Drones will do to win. They are about played out, desperate, financially strapped, and really angry.  Alas, Merlin is nowhere to be found. 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Open Letter to the Catholic Sun

Recently, I read a telling article in the Phoenix Diocese's newspaper, The Catholic Sun.  As  an actively practicing Catholic, I was a bit troubled by the message pushed by the editorial staff.  Please see the original article and then my response:

ARTICLE: http://www.catholicsun.org/2008/feb21/local/immigration-effect.html
 


MY RESPONSE:  ( The Catholic Sun chose not to publish it)

Dear Editors,

Regarding the Catholic Sun's cover story, "EXODUS: Are Arizona Immigration Laws Having An Effect on Churchgoers?".  My simple answer  to the headline's posed question is as a churchgoer, YES, I am deeply effected.  As a Master degreed counselor, I've worked in local schools, for Maricopa County Juvenile Courts, and privately.  I can attest to the fact that there is a great need to help young families suvive and thrive- to ultimately achieve the American Dream. 

Managing Editor and article author, J.D. Long-Garcia, pointed out how there is a natural desire to immigrate and improve, even quoting Pope JohnXXIII. I feel for the young family here with limited options and now a sense of urgency to leave either due to the economy or fear of new legislation. Whether the economic woes we all feel or the laws new impact, the illegal immigrants face the flip side of the American Dream: living within the law is a hard thing to do at times. 

I also read the wonderful and touching story of the Myanmar family of St. Jerome's parish who lost their son.  I was impressed to see that Catholic Charities helped the family emmigrate and find a home in Arizona.  The community helped this family in their joy and now in sorrow. The role of a Church Charity is best met in helping families achieve legal status and find a community of support. 

Unfortunately, Arizona and other states have allowed the laws to be denied, setting  up many a young family.  Lations from Mexico and other Latin American counties have been encouraged to seek out a better life.  Yet, where is the organization,Catholic Charities, in helping these families come in properly and legally?  No matter how Mr. Long-Garcia spins the story, the family in question is in an illegal status and ultimate quagmire as they've been misled, believing that no one would question their status.  Now, many a family had illegal adults, and legal American children, all living as black market beings on the fringe. We Americans buy into the need to save everyone without thinking about what that means.  We are NOT helping families by encouraging them to sneak in, live illegally and marginally, only so we can have a flow of cheap labor.  We are also hurting the alien families and our own citizens when we deny the huge flux of violent crime directly related to illegal aliens. Just ask many of the parishoners who are police officers how they feel about the twisted laws literally tying their hands from processing violent offenders.

I also have seen a great wave of illegal drug and alcohol abuse, domestic violence, and children of high educational need flooding the state and local systems.  They are not turned away and we all have tried to help.  But, like a parent who's let one's child get away with something, we are clamping down and saying no more.

As a a parishioner, I've listened to presentations by pastors of Mexican parishes talk of the degredation and third world-like standards in many poor communities south of the border.  Our parisioners opened their wallets as the plate was passed. We help all of the time and want the poor to have a chance. We need more than  biased, politically charged stories from the Catholic Sun. Your piece was not a news story but an opinion commentary promoted as news.  I want to hear more about what is being done to help Mexicans thrive back home.  With some of the most fertile ground, ideal location, and world importance, why IS Mexico struggling internally?  Poor infrastructure and corruption are critical realities that,  I believe, the Catholic Church as a World-wide organization and political power needs to step up and help as negotiating statesmen. 

Organized crime and drug trafficking  is a booming business of epoch proportions in Mexico.  In fact, there are reports of how the local economies of some areas are improving from the drug cartel monies funneling into the local economies.  Sadly, the local criminals in Mexico see the need for better socieities and the locals cannot turn down the help.  I am tired of the American citizen being blamed for expecting people to follow laws while being asked to donate money while the country of origin is literally ignored.   A vital story I read stated the following: "By some estimates, some $24 billion a year is transferred to Mexico as a result of the drug trade. This is essentially free money and needs to go somewhere, making it a substantial portion of the Mexican economy. While the Mexican government is keen to stop the violence along the border and among the cartels, in some ways it is less interested in stopping the flow of money," (http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/big_business_organized_crime_mexico).

The real story, Mr. Long-Garcia,  is not  the illegal alien scared of being caught, but the multi-billion dollar corrupt practices of drugs, of using and abusing the citizens there, and the absolute drain on our loving society to try and band-aid a political wound , now bleeding out on the Arizonan border. 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Conservative Woman Today

I had the honor of being the guest opinion editorial in our local paper.  Just click this headline as a link below-
 
 
 Thanks  for Reading!!! 
 
GPB
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Drug Demand Fuels Border Woes

 
by Gayle Plato-Besley, M. Ed.

Almost every poll of voter concerns lists illegal immigration as a top problem.  Voters want to know how we are going to stop the flood of illegals coming in, and protect us from the threat of terrorists walking through the back door.  The answer could be a fence or a promise of military might, but truthfully none of these ideas has legs.  We cannot cut of the trafficking of illegals at the knees because the problem is NOT JUST about movement but about flow.
 
The flood is money not people.  Illegals are coming for work, yes, but much of the border runs like puss out of a wound, as foreigners come here to deliver drugs.  We  Americans crave drugs;  the organized crime of trafficking narcotics is a golden path full of promise for the poor and marginally surviving of Mexico.  Rodger Baker, of Stratfor, Inc., writes of the dilemma:
 
"By some estimates, some $24 billion a year is transferred to Mexico as a result of the drug trade. This is essentially free money and needs to go somewhere, making it a substantial portion of the Mexican economy. While the Mexican government is keen to stop the violence along the border and among the cartels, in some ways it is less interested in stopping the flow of money"
There is an economic revolution going on in Mexico and an emerging middle class is coming to the surface, much based on infrastructure laundered or simply infused by the drug cartels funneling the funds into the local ecomomy.  How do you tell families in Mexico to not prosper from local business  created directly from blood money of the drug-addled Americans?
 
Mexico prospers form the funds, while US Citizens lose on every level.  We lose from the trafficking, the illegals coming in, the funds going out, and mostly the ripple effect of drug use as a societal and economic drain.
 
So how do we seal the border? Baker discusses this question:
 
"The problem, of course, with completely sealing a border is that it stops trade, something the United States is not willing to do. Therefore, if the United States cannot effectively seal the border without risking trade, it instead can channel the flow of traffic and migration across the border. But even by channeling the flow, it is extremely difficult to separate the illegal trade from the legal." (http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/big_business_organized_crime_mexico)
 
Do we put a virtual tag on every vehicle person crossing? How do we follow each delivery when the organization of the crime is technologically cutting edge:  cloned UPS and FED-EX trucks alone are almost impossible to stop.  Money can be transferred electronically, with any myriad of ways like an eBay 'purchase' and Paypal money so funds never see a border at all.   The Black Market is on a Greenback Super-Highway.
 
Identity theft is a huge business with Illegal Immigants snagging mock papers.  According to Lifelock, one of the newest trends is to steal American children's identities.  They've social security numbers and no parent thinks about their child having a credit history.  By the time a child gets to college age, he or she may have years of data bastardized, stolen through the slippery firewalls of virtual reality.
 
All of this is a factor of the drug culture needed for the black market of trafficking illegals and substances.  As we know in any free market full of money, the only way to shut off the valve is to turn off demand.  Each candidate for President needs  to talk of more than the politcal emotion evoker:  the poor families suffering to get a job in America. John McCain, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton better talk about how do we stop the run for the border?  We must look at the programs to pump up our education of children and young adults about how drugs kill not only by using but because they fuel evil and degradation here. 
 
We must also talk of the need to help Mexico help itself with infrastructure and middle class development of trade.  Our money is better spent helping Mexicans stay at home instead of just talking about helping the many here.  We already help the aliens here; we must look at helping them not WANT to be here.
 
Our Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Maricopa County has proven that pressuring the day laborers and shaking down the illegals has a ripple effect of illegal exodus.  The families are leaving in such large numbers that some school districts are seeing a 20% decline in enrollment.  This is monumental.  Stop the aliens we find, and the family members of said illegal gets worried.  My personal account is as a citizen driving through Cave Creek, AZ-- I see the sheriff's deputies stopping and questioning people every day.  The number of day laborers loitering is significantly down, and the visable workers offering lawn services are now ghosts.  They are leaving town.
 
This is a huge problem, yes, but I implore John McCain to get the honest, smart talking conversation going where he explains the complexities and  the need to stop the illegals of the border before  ANY get to it.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Funkadelic Hillary Makeover by George!




Newsflash, Washington, D.C.:


With Obama Fever sweeping the nation, token Female Candidate, Hillary Clinton, has sidelined President Bill Clinton for King of Funk, George Clinton.  While rumours rumble the wailing walls of Washington, George Clinton was all over it.  Supposed comment was overheard at a Get up and Funk Rally, with Mr. Clinton saying, "Hey if you can't get it right then I say Funk it!"

The Parliament of Funkadelic will also be included in the new administration as an ad-hoc subcommittee of
Social Awareness and Hipster Doofus Outlook Think Tanking Posse.  Possible early legislation will include naming Jerry Garcia the new Unknown Soldier-of Peace; his remains moved to Arlington.  A flag of the Unknown Soldier of Peace, i.e. the Grateful Dead as it were, will fly at have staff: 


Upon the public announcement of George Clinton's future plans, his statement from the 60's was heard again:
"Behold, I am Funkadelic. I am not of your world. But fear me not, I will do you no harm. Loan me your funky mind and I shall play with it. For nothing is good unless you play with it. And all that is good, is nasty!"

("What Is Soul," Funkadelic, 1969)

But Parliament member, Bootsy, said it best:"

 


I pledge allegiance to the funk,
the whole funk,
and nothing but the funk,
so help me James, Sly and George,
Amen.

 


http://www.fastnbulbous.com/funkadel.htm

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mac Attack: Make it an Extra-Value Meal

by Gayle Plato-Besley

A few months ago I wrote of the need of a Phenom for a presidential candidate as I have included here today.  I am concerned we are lost in the shuffle of a moving, defining pinpoint on the conservative continuum.  Let's not get wrapped up in the minutiae and lose the fight to a truly frightening platform of the Democratic Party.


So as for my last take on the Phenom:


To understand the culture of the day is to study the under belly.  Looking underneath our cloaks, seek the crypto-clues of what we are wanting in a President.  Don't get lost in the psychobabble of  the "hero president" and where is the Reaganesque, swaggering John Wayne-abees? That fluff is so played. 


Get lost in the post 9/11 era and you'll miss the forest through the trees.  We really don't want a normal hero type, but a paranormal Phenom.  This generation of Gen-X, Y and now Z voters grew up watching horror films, playing video games, and reading Stephen King.  Your average 35-45 year old is much more comfortable discussing ghosts than God.  He smoked pot, looks at porn, yet prays a lot too; now has a wife and kids he cannot figure out.  His parents were likely divorced and he secretly thinks movies like Independence Day could happen.

 

He's a fast foodie not eating any of that stylized sludge he watches being whipped up on the Food Channel.  He's overweight, underloved, not sleeping well and he has reflux. Yet, in spite of everything, he loves.   This fact cannot be lost in the shuffle and is the key to it all.  He is sick and tired of being judged by a projectile vomiting media telling him how to feel, live, and vote.

Maybe some thinker in a tank left of central will call him names and miss it all.  This 'guy' is the heart of the country and he lives in the fly over areas-- like Iowa, Michigan, and even Arizona. Liberals are losing more and more ground than you know because they have no clue about who is this voter.  This young Republican is a decent man (or woman) lost in the consumerism, and a product of the weak parenting of the 70s.  He's is just starting to get that he is now in charge.  He has a job, too many bills, and no time for sentimentality. Yet, he does love a good cause and he is searching. 

Women and men of my generation straddle the baby boom gap of post-World War II.  What Bill Clinton captured in the hearts of the boomers was palpable, but they are not the target audience anymore.   The 60s young are now in their sixties and what many had was over-bloated self-confidence fueling their "Me Generation".  My peers did not and do not have that luxury.  We were the first kids taught of Stranger Danger.  Now, our kids can't play in the front yard without a chaperon and are fingerprinted just in case they get abducted.  Monsters are real to us.

Our wanderlust of heart is captured not by a hero but by a superhero.  Watch the movies of our time, read the comics, and understand the love of games and sports.  Warriors, lovers, strongholds of precise drive and direction.  It's  Gladiator and Braveheart, but it's Passion of the Christ meets Predator.  Where's the candidate who shines beyond the dull of this Pale Horse we see riding in?  We truly suspect the Horseman is riding, but we are not thrown at all.  The horror of the day- we have been prepared for the Evil.  Terrorism is the Evil and our Good needs a Leader Beyond the Pale to go beyond protecting us.  We want him to save us  and triumph over Evil.
 


This Phenom may not exist but, please make us think he does, and we are with you.  Why do you think confident, attractive Barack Obama sways the young: he projects stability with a touch of swashbuckle.  Yet, his message is non-existent; Obama says he'll save but does not tell us how.  Barack Obama is a stage prop at the podium. So, who is there for the Republicans?


Just today,  I heard in John McCain some substantial humanity, humility, and defined policies regarding the economy and the war.  McCain was downright contrite- thank God.  We need his reality and commanding strength to come through.  Let John be John.

I believe that the Republicans feeling disenfranchised just want proof, a promise, and a platform from our Grand Old Politician.  We need to be needed and protected, and do not buy into the teleprompter talking points shoveled in most speeches.  Give us more Mr. McCain, like you did today, and hold on tightly to your imperfection as it is your winning feature. 


Many talked of the religion issue bringing down Romney, but I don't think so.  Mitt Romney didn't have likability.  He swaggered, yes, but in the wrong way. Romney seemed like the smart, wealthy, good looking, big man on campus, who's also a bit removed from the real people who have late bills and athlete's feet.  He was not warm and I don't care about his perfect hair. 
 

John McCain is an ol'coot, with an annoying smirkiness and foul mouth.  He's very real and if he keeps his eyes on the people and off of the horrible teleprompter during the speeches, he might do this.  Good guys who are also hotheads flip flop into nice guys when it matters, as they know they are not perfect.  It's the nice guys with perfect hair you watch out for because they lack EMPATHY and seem self-serving. I did not sense any warmth from Mitt Romney and whether you like it or not, many Republicans who made the effort to vote, did not feel a kindred spirit with Mitt Romney either.

So Mr. McCain, can you become the Phenom- that wonder boy though in your seventies; that hopeful new blood on a road less traveled with your old walking papers and maverick shoddy steps?  Show me Mac, and make it an extra-value meal please.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

GOP SMACKDOWN NEEDED!

It's said that the only things we cannot avoid in life are death and taxes.  I am adding debates to the list as we inch so slowly to the finish line of the vote.  The GOP is so civil and decent.  BORING.  I kinda liked the Jerry Springer element of the Donkey Kong debate of last week.   We need to get a moderator like Springer. 

 No, better yet, the World Wrestling Federation could sponsor the debate and do more of a SUPER TUESDAY-GOP Smackdown.  Young voters would go wild, we could have a ring set up in Wesley Bolin Plaza, invite Local celebutwits and high rent low brows to watch.  Hey, I am not the first to note the potential as even John McCain recognizes the fight issue, when referring to Mitt Romney.  He was quoted in late December at boston.com,  "Never get into a wrestling match with a pig. You both get dirty -- and the pig likes it."

  

If not Jerry Springer, I think Bill O'Reilly could do a bang up job as a moderator referee for the event:

All McCain has to do is mess up Mitt Romney's coif and it's game on.  Everybody thinks McCain could win it but I am thinking the dark horse to bring the rest down will be Republican resident craizoid, Ron Paul.  Now to be called, Ron 'the Scarecrow' Paul as he's got a simple scary thing going on; we know he's looking for his brain.

  OOPS!  Thats Ru Paul... although a good candidate for the GOP Smackdown anyway. 

    I think Ron Paul will knock over Romney, mess the mop, and it's a done deal.

 BEFORE:

AFTER:  

UNfortuantely, if John McCain and Mitt Romney are taken down by the third party Scarecrow, we're gonna get this:

   Remember all, in terms of an election, we want this:

Keep and Eye on the Ruby Slippers people....

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Refusing to Choose

by Gayle Plato-Besley, M. Ed.

This week, I received a great e-mail letter from Serrin Foster, the Feminists for Life President.  Foster stated how the feminists of the Roe v. Wade case from 35 years ago twisted the ideals and principles of the original feminist movement of the late 19th and early 20th century.   Elizabeth Cady Stanton, friend and co-writer of suffrage material with Susan B. Anthony, originated Mother's Day.  She celebrated her seven children and praised motherhood in a time when being a mother was not often honored nor recognized as a special calling. 

Stanton wrote:

"When we consider that women are treated as property, it is degrading  to women that we should treat our children as property and dispose of them as we see fit (letter to Julia Ward Howe,1873)"
Both Stanton and Anthony were vehemently against abortion; they advocated for social acceptance of women, mothers, families and children as full beings.  It is sad that the concept of feminism has shifted to such an anti-family, negative association of motherhood and success.  It is a tragedy that women have evolved so little that we've accepted the con that having a baby is an impediment, a trap, keeping us from growth.   


Serrin Foster wrote:

"By accepting pregnancy discrimination in school and workplace and the lack of support in society for pregnant women and parents, especially the poor, Sarah Weddington (Roe v. Wade  case winning attorney) and the Supreme Court betrayed women and undermined the support women need and deserve. Since then, millions of women have paid the price, struggling in school and the workplace without societal support. After all, when it's her body, it's her choice, it's her problem." 

With the Right to Life movement experiencing years of relegated falsehoods, and being portrayed as a fringe group of religious reactionaries, there is a time and place for understanding.  All life matters and the original defenders of women were moms.  They loved their kids and wanted to help other mothers experience all glories of life.

Thankfully, abortion numbers are down but over a million children were terminated this last year.  Of the terminated, children of color  are disproportionately represented.  Also, a large number of women aborting are college age(
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.html).  

Legislation has been introduced to counter the overwhelmingly abortion-choice focused women's health centers on college campuses today.  Many young women can tell of how they receive literature, counseling, and even funding to help them terminate pregnancies, leaving out the baby's father in the process, and taking on the burden of social norms -telling these ladies that children will ruin their lives.  The Elizabeth Cady Stanton Pregnant and Parenting Student Services Act of 2007 , was introduced in bipartisan fashion by Senators Elizabeth Dole, R-N.C., and Ben Nelson, D-Neb. 
“This legislation supports women who wish to be both students and mothers,” said Senator Nelson. “By fostering a parent-friendly environment in our nation’s universities, we can help these students who have made the decision to balance parenthood and education.”

As noted, the legislation asks for a mere pittance of what abortion activism receives. 

The bipartisan Senate bill, if passed into law, would establish a pilot program to provide up to $50 million in grants to encourage institutions of higher education to establish and operate a pregnant and parenting student services office. The on-campus office would serve parenting students, prospective student parents who are pregnant or imminently anticipating an adoption, and students who are placing or have placed a child for adoption. Legislation with the same name was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Representatives Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, and Sue Myrick, R-N.C., in February.

College, employment, and personal development are not choices instead of parenthood. Harmony is blending unique aspects, as is any family.  Many of us were unplanned and thankfully so as that is the way of nature.  Families are part of that natural course of life. If you agree with the thought here, please visit the experts-


For more information, please visit http://www.feministsforlife.org




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

National Security and the South Park Conservative: The Milton-Bradley Paradox Plagues the Candidates

     
Osama bin Laden with Cartman, and Hillary Clinton being informed she has a nuclear device inside her body on "South Park" (Comedy Central)

By Gayle Plato-Besley
Why is it that the creators  of South Park, Matt Stone and Trey ParkerMatt Stone and Trey Parker, understand politics, national defense, and social problems better than a majority of our Presidential candidates? While I grant South Park is lewd, it's also razor-edged satire of a the highest vibration.  It is spot on and generationally accurate.  I admit it- I watch it with glee. 

As for the candidates, I watch them too, and I feel ill.  I like Mike Huckabee's aw shucks  charm, and Barack Obama has a very good stylist.  Mitt  Romney has better hair than John Edwards, and even Hillary Clinton proves makeovers are a good thing.  But really, do any of these people have any CLUE about keeping this country safe?  

Not one of them seems to know the geography of the Middle East, and they go on TV gaffe-happy. Each talking of basic aspects of  international politics with all of the eloquence of Britney Spears.  Hillary seems to confuse a flight into Kosovo with a trip to Costco in terms of danger, and doesn't know the voting rules of Musharraf's Pakistani election.  Also, Obama wants to bomb Pakistan if he finds any leadership sympathetic to Islamic extremists.  Does he realize using that criteria would force a bomb drop on much of the Middle East--so why start with an ally?  Please someone help Clinton, Obama, Huckabee, and even Romney with current events, the basic map, and historical facts of Pakistan and India at least? But really, could someone give Fred Thompson a quad-shot latte and ask him to put down the proverbial banjo?

The Milton-Bradley Paradox plagues us if we don't get this group of buffoons away from the gaming table of spin and babble. Playing Risk and Stratego don't count as experience with military strategies, and the G7 isn't a called turn in Battleship

Tonight, I watched the Republicans and all I could say is that John McCain SPANKED the other candidates.  Now, if only McCain can get on South Park-- he'll win this thing.  Sadly, I think he's a bit less conservative than we'd all like, but I do not think anyone else can win.  He said tonight that he can get Osama Bin Laden and that type of confidence resounds and reverberates with the country.

"Human Intelligence Capability"- it's the little black dress of the next election my friends, and John McCain said it at the FOX debate. Think Illegal Immigration and run to the border if you will, but underlying even that hot tamale is the need to listen in, waterboard, and get cozy with potential enemy combatants.

So the true PARADOX-  Middle America loves Milton-Bradley games and thinks strategy is a succinct function of determining Good, Evil, and how to win.  Strategy is a great coach on game day, four quarters with referees who cannot see the play properly.  We instant replay it all and look for the offsides.  Who is directly telling America that security is the story?  Islamic Extremists are not going to back down but need time to rally and organize.  GOOD INTELLIGENCE and SPEEDY ATTACK ON THE OFFENSE are good game-plan practices.

John McCain is the only one with a convincing message of safety first.  He'll slip on his sound bites of vigorous desire to protect us all.  He is in the shadow of Barry Goldwater who pushed strength on a scared country living in emotional bomb shelters.  The "Daisy Ad" played on those fears and squashed Goldwater the President.

Now we live with really scary times of the Global Jihadist looming at the door.  Yet, the average man is more angry than scared and ready to fight back.  We want the good fight but we want honesty: to be told how to win
by a man who is in charge and confident.  

Can Cartman run for President?

- Gayle Plato-Besley

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Leaner Education Makes Sense in AZ